Posted by: rickcarter | April 3, 2008

Time to Stop Preaching?

I am thinking that maybe I should stop preaching. There is something ineffective about professional ministers delivering sermons to silent congregations. My reading of John Drane’s The McDonaldization of the Church is reinforcing the feeling. He writes, “A minister wishing to empower his or her congregation to take seriously their own calling as the people of God, equipping them to make a distinctive contribution to the corporate life of the body of Christ, whether in worship or witness, simply cannot do it by preaching sermons from a pulpit.”

I know that is true, and for thirty-two years I have had this gnawing misgiving about what I was doing. Even as I prepared the sermon I was anxious about how to transfer to the worshipers the enthusiasm and conviction I was finding in my study of the Word. I dreaded the almost certain result, that following worship I would hear accolades from a few worshipers, but in reality the preached Word was not going to result in transformation.

I would go home on Sunday and console myself with the view of Martin Luther, that as he went home to enjoy his beer (his expression), the preached Word was even then working its way into the souls of the congregation. Maybe so, but it takes a lot of years of preaching to adjust the world view and practices of worshipers. Too long – because worshipers listening to sermons are largely passive, which restricts their ingestion of the Word to what they can remember hearing.

The reason pastors love to preach is because they get so much out of it, not because the congregation gets so much out of it. God’s Word really is a powerful, transformative message. Living in the Word for a few days, while mining the treasures in a passage of scripture, is very rewarding. The problem is that the pastor is getting all this benefit, not the congregation.

I need to consider redefining my role as Minister of Word and Sacrament so that I become the coach and guide to others as they prepare to deliver the Word in worship. Sermons prepared and delivered by the members, not as oral lectures but as corporately conceived, creative embodiments of the message, will likely touch far more lives than I ever will in the traditional format of preaching.

Right now what I am imagining is worship teams – lots of them. Each team is given a passage of scripture to work on a few weeks before their appointed Sunday. I work with them on exegesis and interpretation, and they decide how to present that to the congregation, using as many senses as they can, and engaging the congregation as fully as possible.

My role, then, would be (1) planning worship a few weeks in advance, by choosing the scriptures to be used each Sunday, (2) meeting with worship teams as they study and prepare, and (3) reviewing with the team afterward as to how they think they did. In other words, coach and trainer.

I want to think hard about his. Not only would the end product be more effective, but it would move us closer to the biblical model of the whole congregation actively participating in worship.

Responses

I found your blog on google and read a few of your other posts. I just added you to my Google News Reader. Keep up the good work. Look forward to reading more from you in the future.

Stacey Derbinshire

It was kind of funny today at church. 4 elderly women were sitting next to one another and enjoying worship. About the middle of the sermon each one nodded off. If Norman Rockwell could have painted a picture of these women it would sell millions.

Two ways to look at this….more participation…more learning or naptime is a time for renewal

A gnawing misgiving! I’d like to provide my viewpoint from the receiving end of your not-so-interactive preaching.

I consider myself to be blessed beyond words to have not one but two pastors who give the best sermons that I’ve ever heard. Yes, it’s a lecture but that’s a format that I find to be the best for learning. I pay close attention to the hymns because they’re always carefully chosen to reinforce the scripture. Even the prayers provided for meditation are linked in meaning to the morning’s message.

I guess you aren’t getting feedback from your quieter members but your sermons are discussed on the ride home, again with my husband, and often again at church meetings in the evening later that week. I find that reading the Bible on my own is confusing and often contradictory. I rely on you to provide a cohesive lesson - explanation, interpretation and emotion - all rolled together. I think that both you and Dr. Craft are exceptional at accomplishing this.

A sermon probably isn’t the best way to enact a transformation. But the education, the spark of interest which you always generate, just might.

I am one of the congregation who will never be up front engaging in any performance art in order to capture the attention of a tuned out congregation. I agree that some people are not connected and a sermon is not going to complete the connection. I just want to say that for some of us, what you are doing is perfect.

Having said how much I like the way things are, I’m still looking forward to receiving what you’ve learned during your adventures in spirit!

I am grateful, of course, for the testimony about how the preached word works in your life. And I actually do believe in the value of the preached Word. It is slow; it is cumulative, but God does shape our souls over time through this medium.

But Drane’s thesis has to do with Postmodern ears. There is almost nobody in today’s churches who is Postmodern, but people with Postmodern sensibilities are becoming more and more the norm in America. And they don’t respond so well to lectures or exhortations.

Drane looks at how Jesus taught, and how the prophets communicated, to show that God has often used other communication styles to convey his message. For the sake of getting the gospel to our current generation, we need to take a fresh look at these other approaches.

At first, I loved the idea of having worship “teams” prepare and present the message each week. But then, thinking about it, I realized that the quality of the presentation would suffer greatly, potentially fatally! Sure, there are some good presenters in any congregation, but the art of crafting a message that is cohesive, easy to follow, and applicational takes years to master. I think the congregation would frequently suffer from a low-quality presentation.

In addition, I think you would end up with the same problem you started with: the only people really gaining from the study of the Bible are the “teams” that are preparing for a given Sunday. While that WOULD mean that more people are really digging into the Bible, I think the net result would be a loss for the congregation, since the quality of the presentation would often suffer.

Time to Stop Preaching?
I agree with Nate that the congregation would frequently suffer from a low-quality presentation. (Although how many congregations do that already with a trained minister in the pulpit?)

My suggestion would be to have 12 teams and implement it one Sunday a month. That way you get the interaction but you are still preaching a majority of the time.

Interesting ideas. I think I tend to lean toward Anne’s idea as a possible way to enjoy the best of both.
Adult learning principles show that the best way to learn something is to prepare to teach it. No doubt worship teams would improve learning, but is the sermon meant only as a teaching vehicle or to inspire? Either way, I am comforted by the fact that when we open our hearts to the Holy Spirit, all things are possible.

Rick, keep gnawing away at this feeling. The 18th Century lecture format is not conveying much in today’s world. I even hear seasoned speakers say that 10 min is the max time people will listen to a sustained speech. I would lift up a theme for the day and approach it through media, biblical foundation/approach, acting, song, and more. The point being that I hope we actually want to convey a deep truth to people each Sunday - and if so, what will it take to connect well with them these days?

See http://www.visualstory.org for some perspectives on this.

Leave a response

Your response:

Categories